Welcome to

Subscribe: Posts Subscribe to Revolution ChurchComments

ABOUT US

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

PTI

0 komentar

The PTI

The PTI is my proprietary composite of 8 items, each one dealing strictly with market action. So no subjective considerations, no guessing, no adjusting -- these 8 items are based on actual daily market action. I've been running the PTI daily since 1971. The PTI monitors the sub-structure of the NYSE. I liken it to the water in a bathtub. The Nasdaq (the soap) can bounce up and down all it wants, but it's the level in the bathtub that tells us what the great primary trend is doing. The PTI is the level of the water in the tub.

The Advance-Decline Ratio

The advance-decline ratio monitors the direction of the majority of stocks on the NYSE. Each day I take the difference between all the issues that advanced and all the issues that declined. To adjust for the increased number of issues that appear on the NYSE over the years, I divide the daily differential by the issues traded each day. If more issues were down for the day, I subtract from the previous day's total. The total can be started anywhere -- at 10,000, 50,000, a million.

The Big Money Breadth Index (BBI)

The Big Money Breadth Index (BBI) is an index I "invented". To my knowledge, nobody else runs it. It's an advance-decline of the ten largest-cap stocks in the S&P 500. I think it's a valuable index since the direction of the majority of these ten giants has to be important in the broad market picture. It's hard to envision a bull market without the BBI trending generally higher. It's hard to conceive of a bear market without the BBI trending generally lower.

»» read more

COMPOUNDING

0 komentar

MAKING MONEY: The most popular piece I've published in 40 years of writing these Letters was entitled, "Rich Man, Poor Man." I have had dozens of requests to run this piece again or for permission to reprint it for various business organizations.

Making money entails a lot more than predicting which way the stock or bond markets are heading or trying to figure which stock or fund will double over the next few years. For the great majority of investors, making money requires a plan, self-discipline and desire. I say, "for the great majority of people" because if you're a Steven Spielberg or a Bill Gates you don't have to know about the Dow or the markets or about yields or price/earnings ratios. You're a phenomenon in your own field, and you're going to make big money as a by-product of your talent and ability. But this kind of genius is rare.

For the average investor, you and me, we're not geniuses so we have to have a financial plan. In view of this, I offer below a few items that we must be aware of if we are serious about making money.

Rule 1: Compounding: One of the most important lessons for living in the modern world is that to survive you've got to have money. But to live (survive) happily, you must have love, health (mental and physical), freedom, intellectual stimulation -- and money. When I taught my kids about money, the first thing I taught them was the use of the "money bible." What's the money bible? Simple, it's a volume of the compounding interest tables.

Compounding is the royal road to riches. Compounding is the safe road, the sure road, and fortunately, anybody can do it. To compound successfully you need the following: perseverance in order to keep you firmly on the savings path. You need intelligence in order to understand what you are doing and why. And you need a knowledge of the mathematics tables in order to comprehend the amazing rewards that will come to you if you faithfully follow the compounding road. And, of course, you need time, time to allow the power of compounding to work for you. Remember, compounding only works through time.

But there are two catches in the compounding process. The first is obvious -- compounding may involve sacrifice (you can't spend it and still save it). Second, compounding is boring -- b-o-r-i-n-g. Or I should say it's boring until (after seven or eight years) the money starts to pour in. Then, believe me, compounding becomes very interesting. In fact, it becomes downright fascinating!

In order to emphasize the power of compounding, I am including this extraordinary study, courtesy of Market Logic, of Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33306. In this study we assume that investor (B) opens an IRA at age 19. For seven consecutive periods he puts $2,000 in his IRA at an average growth rate of 10% (7% interest plus growth). After seven years this fellow makes NO MORE contributions -- he's finished.

A second investor (A) makes no contributions until age 26 (this is the age when investor B was finished with his contributions). Then A continues faithfully to contribute $2,000 every year until he's 65 (at the same theoretical 10% rate).

Now study the incredible results. B, who made his contributions earlier and who made only seven contributions, ends up with MORE money than A, who made 40 contributions but at a LATER TIME. The difference in the two is that B had seven more early years of compounding than A. Those seven early years were worth more than all of A's 33 additional contributions.

This is a study that I suggest you show to your kids. It's a study I've lived by, and I can tell you, "It works." You can work your compounding with muni-bonds, with a good money market fund, with T-bills or say with five-year T-notes.

table1

Rule 2: DON'T LOSE MONEY: This may sound naive, but believe me it isn't. If you want to be wealthy, you must not lose money, or I should say must not lose BIG money. Absurd rule, silly rule? Maybe, but MOST PEOPLE LOSE MONEY in disastrous investments, gambling, rotten business deals, greed, poor timing. Yes, after almost five decades of investing and talking to investors, I can tell you that most people definitely DO lose money, lose big time -- in the stock market, in options and futures, in real estate, in bad loans, in mindless gambling, and in their own business.

RULE 3: RICH MAN, POOR MAN: In the investment world the wealthy investor has one major advantage over the little guy, the stock market amateur and the neophyte trader. The advantage that the wealthy investor enjoys is that HE DOESN'T NEED THE MARKETS. I can't begin to tell you what a difference that makes, both in one's mental attitude and in the way one actually handles one's money.

The wealthy investor doesn't need the markets, because he already has all the income he needs. He has money coming in via bonds, T-bills, money market funds, stocks and real estate. In other words, the wealthy investor never feels pressured to "make money" in the market.

The wealthy investor tends to be an expert on values. When bonds are cheap and bond yields are irresistibly high, he buys bonds. When stocks are on the bargain table and stock yields are attractive, he buys stocks. When real estate is a great value, he buys real estate. When great art or fine jewelry or gold is on the "give away" table, he buys art or diamonds or gold. In other words, the wealthy investor puts his money where the great values are.

And if no outstanding values are available, the wealthy investors waits. He can afford to wait. He has money coming in daily, weekly, monthly. The wealthy investor knows what he is looking for, and he doesn't mind waiting months or even years for his next investment (they call that patience).

But what about the little guy? This fellow always feels pressured to "make money." And in return he's always pressuring the market to "do something" for him. But sadly, the market isn't interested. When the little guy isn't buying stocks offering 1% or 2% yields, he's off to Las Vegas or Atlantic City trying to beat the house at roulette. Or he's spending 20 bucks a week on lottery tickets, or he's "investing" in some crackpot scheme that his neighbor told him about (in strictest confidence, of course).

And because the little guy is trying to force the market to do something for him, he's a guaranteed loser. The little guy doesn't understand values so he constantly overpays. He doesn't comprehend the power of compounding, and he doesn't understand money. He's never heard the adage, "He who understands interest -- earns it. He who doesn't understand interest -- pays it." The little guy is the typical American, and he's deeply in debt.

The little guy is in hock up to his ears. As a result, he's always sweating -- sweating to make payments on his house, his refrigerator, his car or his lawn mower. He's impatient, and he feels perpetually put upon. He tells himself that he has to make money -- fast. And he dreams of those "big, juicy mega-bucks." In the end, the little guy wastes his money in the market, or he loses his money gambling, or he dribbles it away on senseless schemes. In short, this "money-nerd" spends his life dashing up the financial down-escalator.

But here's the ironic part of it. If, from the beginning, the little guy had adopted a strict policy of never spending more than he made, if he had taken his extra savings and compounded it in intelligent, income-producing securities, then in due time he'd have money coming in daily, weekly, monthly, just like the rich man. The little guy would have become a financial winner, instead of a pathetic loser.

RULE 4: VALUES: The only time the average investor should stray outside the basic compounding system is when a given market offers outstanding value. I judge an investment to be a great value when it offers (a) safety; (b) an attractive return; and (c) a good chance of appreciating in price. At all other times, the compounding route is safer and probably a lot more profitable, at least in the long run.

»» read more

PERFECTION

0 komentar

AH PERFECTION: Strange, but the most popular, the most widely-requested, and the most widely quoted piece I've ever written was not about the stock market -- it was about business, and specifically about what I call the theoretical "ideal business." I first published this piece in the early-1970s. I repeated it in Letter 881 and then again in Letter 982. I've added a few thoughts in each successive edition. But seldom does a month go by when I don't get requests from subscribers or from some publication or corporation to republish "the ideal business." So here it is again -- with a few added comments.

I once asked a friend, a prominent New York corporate lawyer, "Dave, in all your years of experience, what was the single best business you've ever come across?" Without hesitation, Dave answered, "I have a client whose sole business is manufacturing a chemical that is critical in making synthetic rubber. This chemical is used in very small quantities in rubber manufacturing, but it is absolutely essential and can be used in only super-refined form.

"My client is the only one who manufactures this chemical. He therefore owns a virtual monopoly since this chemical is extremely difficult to manufacture and not enough of it is used to warrant another company competing with him. Furthermore, since the rubber companies need only small quantities of this chemical, they don't particularly care what they pay for it -- as long as it meets their very demanding specifications. My client is a millionaire many times over, and his business is the best I've ever come across." I was fascinated by the lawyer's story, and I never forgot it.

When I was a young man and just out of college my father gave me a few words of advice. Dad had loads of experience; he had been in the paper manufacturing business; he had been assistant to Mr. Sam Bloomingdale (of Bloomingdale's Department store); he had been in construction (he was a civil engineer); and he was also an expert in real estate management.

Here's what my dad told me: "Richard, stay out of the retail business. The hours are too long, and you're dealing with every darn variable under the sun. Stay out of real estate; when hard times arrive real estate comes to a dead stop and then it collapses. Furthermore, real estate is illiquid. When the collapse comes, you can't unload. Get into manufacturing; make something people can use. And make something that you can sell to the world. But Richard, my boy, if you're really serious about making money, get into the money business. It's clean, you can use your brains, you can get rid of your inventory and your mistakes in 30 seconds, and your product, money, never goes out of fashion."

So much for my father's wisdom (which was obviously tainted by the Great Depression). But Dad was a very wise man. For my own part, I've been in a number of businesses -- from textile designing to advertising to book publishing to owning a night club to the investment advisory business.

It's said that every business needs (1) a dreamer, (2) a businessman, and (3) a S.O.B. Well, I don't know about number 3, but most successful businesses do have a number 3 or all too often they seem to have a combined number 2 and number 3.

Bill Gates is known as "America's richest man." Bully for Billy. But do you know what Gates' biggest coup was? When Gates was dealing with IBM, Big Blue needed an operating system for their computer. Gates didn't have one, but he knew where to find one. A little outfit in Seattle had one. Gates bought the system for a mere $50,000 and presented it to IBM. That was the beginning of Microsoft's rise to power. Lesson: It's not enough to have the product, you have to know and understand your market. Gates didn't have the product, but he knew the market -- and he knew where to acquire the product.

Apple had by far the best product in the Mac. But Apple made a monumental mistake. They refused to license ALL PC manufacturers to use the Mac operating system. If they had, Apple today could be Microsoft, and Gates would still be trying to come out with something useful (the fact is Microsoft has been a follower and a great marketer, not an innovator). "Find a need and fill it," runs the old adage. Maybe today they should change that to, "Dream up a need and fill it." That's what has happened in the world of computers. And it will happen again and again.

All right, let's return to that wonderful world of perfection. I spent a lot of time and thought in working up the criteria for what I've termed the IDEAL BUSINESS. Now obviously, the ideal business doesn't exist and probably never will. But if you're about to start a business or join someone else's business or if you want to buy a business, the following list may help you. The more of these criteria that you can apply to your new business or new job, the better off you'll be.

(1) The ideal business sells the world, rather than a single neighborhood or even a single city or state. In other words, it has an unlimited global market (and today this is more important than ever, since world markets have now opened up to an extent unparalleled in my lifetime). By the way, how many times have you seen a retail store that has been doing well for years -- then another bigger and better retail store moves nearby, and it's kaput for the first store.

(2) The ideal business offers a product which enjoys an "inelastic" demand. Inelastic refers to a product that people need or desire -- almost regardless of price.

(3) The ideal business sells a product which cannot be easily substituted or copied. This means that the product is an original or at least it's something that can be copyrighted or patented.

(4) The ideal business has minimal labor requirements (the fewer personnel, the better). Today's example of this is the much-talked about "virtual corporation." The virtual corporation may consist of an office with three executives, where literally all manufacturing and services are farmed out to other companies.

(5) The ideal business enjoys low overhead. It does not need an expensive location; it does not need large amounts of electricity, advertising, legal advice, high-priced employees, large inventory, etc.

(6) The ideal business does not require big cash outlays or major investments in equipment. In other words, it does not tie up your capital (incidentally, one of the major reasons for new-business failure is under-capitalization).

(7) The ideal business enjoys cash billings. In other words, it does not tie up your capital with lengthy or complex credit terms.

(8) The ideal business is relatively free of all kinds of government and industry regulations and strictures (and if you're now in your own business, you most definitely know what I mean with this one).

(9) The ideal business is portable or easily moveable. This means that you can take your business (and yourself) anywhere you want -- Nevada, Florida, Texas, Washington, S. Dakota (none have state income taxes) or hey, maybe even Monte Carlo or Switzerland or the south of France.

(10) Here's a crucial one that's often overlooked; the ideal business satisfies your intellectual (and often emotional) needs. There's nothing like being fascinated with what you're doing. When that happens, you're not working, you're having fun.

(11) The ideal business leaves you with free time. In other words, it doesn't require your labor and attention 12, 16 or 18 hours a day (my lawyer wife, who leaves the house at 6:30 AM and comes home at 6:30 PM and often later, has been well aware of this one).

(12) Super-important: the ideal business is one in which your income is not limited by your personal output (lawyers and doctors have this problem). No, in the ideal business you can sell 10,000 customers as easily as you sell one (publishing is an example).

That's it. If you use this list it may help you cut through a lot of nonsense and hypocrisy and wishes and dreams regarding what you are looking for in life and in your work. None of us own or work at the ideal business. But it's helpful knowing what we're looking for and dealing with. As a buddy of mine once put it, "I can't lay an egg and I can't cook, but I know what a great omelet looks like and tastes like."

»» read more

HOPE

0 komentar

HOPE: It's human nature to be optimistic. It's human nature to hope. Furthermore, hope is a component of a healthy state of mind. Hope is the opposite of negativity. Negativity in life can lead to anger, disappointment and depression. After all, if the world is a negative place, what's the point of living in it? To be negative is to be anti-life.

Ironically, it doesn't work that way in the stock market. In the stock market hope is a hindrence, not a help. Once you take a position in a stock, you obviously want that stock to advance. But if the stock that you bought is a real value, and you bought it right -- you should be content to sit with that stock in the knowledge that over time its value will out without your help, without your hoping.

So in the case of this stock, you have value on your side -- and all you need is patience. In the end, your patience will pay off with a higher price for your stock. Hope shouldn't play any part in this process. You don't need hope, because you bought the stock when it was a great value, and you bought it at the right time.

Any time you find yourself hoping in this business, the odds are that you are on the wrong path -- or that you did something stupid that should be corrected.

Unfortuneately hope is a money-loser in the investment business. This is counter-intuitive but true. Hope will keep you riding a stock that is headed down. Hope will keep you from taking a small loss and instead, allowing that small loss to develop into a large loss.

In the stock market hope get in the way of reality, hope gets in the way of common sense. One of the first rules in investing is "Don't take the big loss." In order to do that, you've got to be willing to take a small loss.

If the stock market turns bearish, and you're staying put with your whole position. and you're HOPING that what you see is not really happening – then welcome to poverty city. In this situation, all your hoping isn't going to save you or make you a penny. In fact, in this situation hoping is the devil that bids you to sit -- while your portfolio of stocks goes down the drain.

In the investing business my suggestion is that you avoid hope. Forget the siren, hope -- instead embrace cold, clear reality.

»» read more

BOND

0 komentar

A PRIMER ON BONDS: The bond market is massive, actually dwarfing the market in stocks. Almost all my subscriber have some familiarity and experience with common stocks. Bonds are another story. Most subscribers (and their brokers, I might add) know little about bonds. Most subscribers have never bought a bond, and many brokers have never sold a bond.

Because bonds may be an increasingly important addition to your portfolio, I want to present this very basic information on bonds.

First, what is a bond? A bond is a debt security. It represent a loan from the government, a state, a county or municipality, or it can represent a loan from a corporation. A bond is simply a unit of debt that a borrower sells to an investor.

A bond is called a fixed income security because the interest rate or "coupon" that the investor receives at the time that the bond is issued remains fixed. The coupon does not change once the bond is issued.

When you buy a bond which provides a certain yield at the time of purchase, that is the yield you will receive on your original investment regardless of whether the bond rises or falls in price in the open market. For instance, say you buy a bond that has a 5% coupon and you buy the bond for a thousand dollars. No matter where that bond goes in the open market, you're going to receive that fixed rate of 5% or $50 per each thousand dollar bond.

Bonds are almost always issued in denominations of one thousand dollars, but bonds are quoted in percentages. In other words, a bond which is quoted at 100 or par would sell for exactly one thousand dollars, par equaling one thousand.

Interest rates in the open market change almost daily. These daily changes effect the daily market price of bonds. Bonds move inversely with prevailing interest rates. As interest rates move up, the price of bonds moves down, -- and as interest rates decline, the price of bonds moves up.

Now suppose interest rates rise on the open market. Your bond will decline in price so that its interest will be in line with the market's interest. But regardless, you will continue to receive your $50 a year interest on your bond, even though the market price of your bond is lower (most bonds pay semi-annually or twice a year).

This is important – if say rates decline and your bond rises, you then have to decide whether to keep the bond and continue to collect your $50 a year or to sell your bond at a profit -- but you can't have your cake and eat it too. In other words, you have to decide whether to continue collecting your 5% interest or whether to take the profit (and pay the taxes on your capital gains).

Of course, if you sell your bond and take the profit, you then have the problem of what to do with the money. If you want to buy more bonds, you're probably going to get less yield, because as I said, rates were going down, which is why your bond rallied in the first place.

As for bond yields, there are three items to consider. The first is the bond's yield to maturity, which is the yield based on holding the bond to maturity.

The second is the yield to call, meaning the yield if the bond is called at a certain price (the call price is stated when you buy the bond).

The third item is the yield based on the day or the hour you buy the bond.

Not all bonds are callable. But if a bond is callable, you want to know at what date that bond is callable and at what price it is callable. That could be a problem if you pay a premium for a bond. Say you buy a bond that is now selling for 113 and the bond is callable at 102. If the bond is called at 102 you're going to face a loss of 11 points. For this reason, I try to buy bonds that are selling at a discount rather than a premium, since a discounted bond is far less likely to be called.

Example – if I buy a bond for 78 and it's callable at 102, why would the issuer call the bond at 102 when the company could go into the open market at buy the bond at 78? They wouldn't, and that's the advantage of a discounted bond that's callable at a much higher price. The bond just isn't likely to be called.

I have called compounding "the royal road to riches." That's because if you buy a security that pays a good dividend or a decent rate of interest and you reinvest the dividends or the interest, then the compounding effect become very powerful over time.

The compounding effect is very important with bonds, even more so than with stocks, because in bonds you know exactly how much income is coming in. Furthermore, most bonds today provide a much higher return than do stocks.

Many died-in-the-wool bond investors follow a system of reinvesting their bond income, and thus they follow a policy of compounding through time.

If you compound long enough, the compounding effect becomes so powerful that after a number of years you'll be accumulating so much money that the original cost of the bonds becomes a non-factor. In other words, the increase in value of your overall portfolio will dwarf the cost of the bond that you bought earlier in the program.

The safest and most liquid bonds are bonds issued by the US government. The next safest bonds are those issued by a government agency. Treasury debt issued by the US government is extremely safe because it carries the full faith and credit of the US government.

Treasury bills or T-bills are sold in maturities of 91-days, 26 weeks or 52 weeks, and they are quoted in discounted form. In other words, you may buy a T-bill at $988 (it's always discounted) but it will mature in 91 days at par or one thousand.

T-notes are maturites of over one year up to ten years. They are quoted in 32nds of a point. When they talk about a T-note at 95.10 they mean 98 and 10/32nds of one thousand dollars.

US Treasury bonds are issued in maturities of more than 10 years. Some Treasuries are callable, meaning that at the government's option, the bonds can be called back to the Treasury at a fixed price and at a fixed time which is stated in the bond's original description. The bonds, if they are callable, will be called at par or 1000. T-bonds pay semi-annually.

By the way, Treasury bills, notes and bonds are taxable by the federal government, but they are free of state taxes.

The US government authorizes certain agencies to issue bonds. The Federal Farm Credit Banks the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp., the Government National Mortgage Association, the Inter-American Development Bank, they are all managed and backed by the US government. The Federal National Mortgage Association, Federal Home Loan Banks and the Student Loan Marketing Association are run by private corporations but they do have the quasi-backing of the US government.

OK, now for municipal bonds. Municipal or "muni" bonds are securities that represent loans by investors to a state or a municipality or a city or a legally constituted subdivision of a state or a US territory (Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands). Munis are issued to finance public works and construction projects or even loans to universities -- always something that will benefit the public.

Munis vary in safety, and they are rated by a few rating agencies. Munis range in maturies from a month to half a century. Munis are usually exempt from federal taxation, and if you buy a muni that is issued in your own state, the bond is usually exempt from both federal and your own state's taxes.

The two types of munis are GOs or general obligation bonds which carry the full faith and credit of the issuer, and revenue bonds which are backed by the revenue which comes from the facility that is being financed.

I'm not going to go into corporate bonds, because I prefer either government bills, notes, bonds (highest safety) or munis (tax free).

When buying munis, I prefer buying munis that are rated AA or AAA on their own. However, many munis are insured by agencies, and if insured by a recognized agency the rating companies usually gives them an AAA rating.

I've been asked, "How good are the agencies which insure these bonds in the case of a national disaster?" I don’t have the answer to that one. Which is why I prefer muni bonds that are so solid that they are rated AA or AAA on their own, based on their superior credit worthiness.

Remember, bonds can advance sharply in an environment where interest rates are dropping. But bonds can also hit the skids in an environment where interest rates are rising.

Bonds are particularly sensitive to inflation or deflation. As a rule, bonds do not do well in an inflationary environment. Since World War II the US has tended to be on an inflationary path – thus, the public's increasing affection for stocks over bonds. But there are times when bonds will outperform stocks, such as during the first half of 2001.

Stocks and bonds both have their place in portfolios. In bear markets, you usually do best in high-grade bonds. In bull markets stocks (if purchased at the right time) will almost always beat bonds.

If you want to buy bonds, you can buy them over the internet or you can buy them through a broker. Personally, I prefer a broker, but important – he or she must be a broker who is thoroughly familiar with bonds. Most brokerage office have one or more brokers who specialize in bonds, and these are the brokers I would use (the great majority of brokers sell stocks or funds – for this reason, most brokers are not familiar with the specialized world of bonds).


»» read more

FIXED INCOME & INTEREST

0 komentar

FIXED INCOME AND INTEREST RATES: In talking to my 23 year-old son, Ryan, about a certain preferred stock, I realized that he did not understand interest rates. And in talking to other subscribers, I've been surprised to learn how many subscribers shared Ryan's er ? lack of understanding about rates.

So here goes. Let's take a preferred stock that pays a fixed dividend of $2.50 annually. Year in and year out that preferred stock will pay $2.50. But the price of the stock itself will fluctuate. One month the stock will sell for 35 dollars, a year later it will sell for 40, and five years later it will sell for 27 dollars. But the stock will always pay the same amount, $2.50 a year.

Then why does the market price of this stock fluctuate? The price of this preferred stock fluctuates because it is influenced by prevailing outside interest rates.

One major factor in changing interest rates is inflation. Inflation is brought on by governments that create money. If too much money is created by the Federal Reserve, then those excess dollars drive up the price of goods. As the price of goods rises, it requires MORE DOLLARS to buy the same items. This is price inflation. In price inflation it costs you $2.00 to buy a certain loaf of bread. Six months later it costs you $2.25 to buy that same loaf of bread.

Buyers of fixed income securities are not protected when inflation arrives. Unlike common stocks, which theoretically can raise their dividends during inflationary times, the buyer or owner of the preferred stock (discussed above) cannot raise its dividend. Thus, the price of that preferred stock, which pays a steady $2.50, will suffer during inflation.

The preferred stock will not be able to raise its dividend during inflation so how does it adjust? It adjusts by changing its price on the open market.

As inflation increases, the preferred stock will decline in price. It will decline because that fixed dividend of $2.50 is worth less and less in terms of purchasing power. Let's say the price of the stock is 35 on the open market. At that price the stock will yield 7.14% ($.50 divided by 35). Next, inflation heats up and the price of the stock drops to 30. At 30, still with that same fixed $2.50 dividend the yield rises to 8.3% ($2.50 divided by 30). Thus the new buyer receives increased protection against inflation because he's getting a higher yield for his money.

But then a recession sets in and inflation drops to almost zero. That $2.50 dividend without inflation is worth a lot more. The stock rises in price to 40 dollars. At a price of 40 dollars, the same stock with the same $2.50 dividend drops in yield to 6.25% ($2.50 divided by 40).

So you see that we're dealing with a preferred stock that always pays the same $2.50 dividend but its price varies based on the state of inflation in the nation and thus the state of prevailing interest rates.

Question: How does the person who owns a slew of this preferred stock protect himself against inflation? The only way is through compounding. He must continually reinvest that $2.50 dividend in more of the preferred stock. This compounding process will probably outpace inflation over the years.

But he must continue to compound, or to reinvest. Otherwise, if inflation continues and the person spends the $2.50 dividend instead of reinvesting it, he's going to lose out since his original investment will be worth less and less as the years go by. His investments will be worth less and less because that fixed $2.50 dividend will buy him less and less in terms of goods and services.

By the way, I picked a preferred stock as an example in this piece. But you can substitute a bond for the preferred and the rationale remains the same. For more on compounding, read "Rich Man, Poor Man" on this same site.

»» read more

ACTING

0 komentar

ACTING: A few days ago a young subscriber asked me, "Russell, you've been dealing with the markets since the late-1940s. This is a strange question, but what is the most important lesson you've learned in all that time?"

I didn't have to think too long. I told him, "The most important lesson I've learned comes from something Freud said. He said, 'Thinking is rehearsing.' What Freud meant was that thinking is no substitute for acting. In this world, in investing, in any field, there is no substitute for taking action."

This brings up another story which illustrates that same theme. J.P. Morgan was "Master of the Universe" back in the 1920's. Morgan belonged to many exclusive and expensive clubs. One day a young man came up to Morgan and said, "Mr. Morgan, I'm sorry to bother you, but I own some stocks that have been acting poorly, and I'm very anxious about these stocks. In fact worrying about those stocks is starting to ruin my health. Yet, I still like the stocks. It's a terrible dilemma. What do you think I should do, sir?"

Without hesitating Morgan said, "Young man, sell to the sleeping point."

The lesson is the same. There's no substitute for acting. In the business of investing or in the business of life, thinking is not going to do it for you. Thinking is just rehearsing. You must learn to act.

That's the single most important lesson that I've learned in this business.

Again, and I've written about this episode before, a very wealthy and successful investor once said to me, "Russell, do you know why stock brokers never become rich in this business?"

I confessed that I didn't know. He explained, "They don't get rich because they never believe their own bullshit."

Again, it's the same lesson. If you want to make money (or get rich) in a bull market, thinking and talking isn't going to do it. You've got to buy stocks. Brokers never do that. Do you know one broker who has?

A painful lesson. Back in 1991 when we had a perfect opportunity, we could have ended Saddam Hussein's career, and we could have done it with ease. But those in command, for political reasons, didn't want to face the adverse publicity of taking additional US casualties. So we stopped short, and Saddam was home free. We were afraid to act. And now we're dealing with that failure to act with another and messier war.

In my own life many of the mistakes I've made have come because I forgot or ignored the "acting lesson". Thinking is rehearsing, and I was rehearsing instead of acting. Bad marriages, bad investments, lost opportunities, bad business decisions -- all made worse because we fail for any number of reasons to act.

The reasons to act are almost always better than the reasons you can think up not to act. If you, my dear subscribers, can understand the meaning of what is expressed in this one sentence, then believe me, you've learned a most valuable lesson. It's a lesson that has saved my life many times. And I mean, literally -- it's a lesson that has saved my life.

»» read more

TIME

0 komentar

TIME -- Here's something they won't tell you at your local brokerage office or in the "How to Beat the Market" books. All investing and speculation is basically an exercise in attempting to beat time.

"Russell, what are you talking about?"

Just what I said -- when you try to pick the winning stock or when you try to sell out near the top of a bull market or when you try in-and-out trading, you may not realize it but what you're doing is trying to beat time.

Time is the single most valuable asset you can ever have in your investment arsenal. The problem is that none of us has enough of it.

But let's indulge in a bit of fantasy. Let's say you have 200 years to live, 200 years in which to invest. Here's what you could do. You could buy $20,000 worth of municipal bonds yielding say 5.5%.

At 5.5% money doubles in 13 years. So here's your plan -- each time your money doubles you add another $10.000. So at the end of 13 years you have $40,000 plus the $10,000 you've added, meaning that at the end of 13 years you'd have $50,000.

At the end of the next 13 years you have $100,000, you add $10,000 and then you'd have $110,000. You reinvest it all in 5.5% munis and at the end of the next 13 years you'd have $220,000 and you add $10,000 making it $230,000.

At the end of the next 13 years you'd have $460,000 and you add $10,000 making it $470,000.

In 200 years there are 15.3 doubles. You do the math. By the end of the 200th year you wouldn't know what to do with all your money. It would be coming out of your ears. And all with minimum risk.

So with enough time, you would be rich -- guaranteed. You wouldn't have to waste any time picking the right stock or the right group or the right mutual fund. You would just compound your way to riches, using your greatest asset -- time.

There's only one problem, In the real world you're not going to live 200 years. But if you start young enough or if you start your kids early, you or they might have anywhere from 30 to 60 years of time ahead of you.

Because most people have run out of time, they spend endless hours and nervous energy trying to beat time, which, by the way, is really what investing is all about. Pick a stock that advances from 3 to 100 and if you've put enough money in that stock you'll have beaten time. Or join a company that gives you a million options and your option moves up from 3 to 25 and again you’ve beaten time.

How about this real example of beating time -- John Walter joined AT&T, but after nine short months he was out of a job. The complaint was that Walter "lacked intellectual leadership." Walter got $26 million for that little stint in a severance package. That's what you call really beating time. Of course, a few of us might have another word for it -- and for AT&T.

»» read more